Whiny women march…
Since the 1970’s a woman in America could complain of abuse by an employer or business, then sit on her fanny while the federal government pursued the alleged miscreant, and the complaining woman would get the fine or jury award and we taxpayers would pick up the entire cost of the venture. That is not human rights, or civil rights, or even women’s rights – it’s special rights to which no one else is entitled, and that is how the so-called women’s rights groups want to keep it.
They also want to keep getting the tax breaks for minority and women-owned businesses, despite numerous reports that many of the women are merely fronts for the businesses and contribute nothing to it beyond getting them the preferential loan treatments and special dispensations.
The progressive women’s groups keep some very unsavory company, such as the D.C. organizer, who is pro Sharia law and has ties to the terrorist group Hamas. Additionally, at least 56 partners of the D.C. march have ties to George Soros, as well as Hillary Clinton.
I channel-surfed to see what the marchers were saying. Many of them just seemed to be hysterically anti-Trump, but none of them made much sense, especially those complaining about an apparent nation-wide shortage of pink yarn with which to make their pussy hats. Drew Belsky had a much better idea, except I doubt many of those marchers could fry an egg successfully.
Progressive feminism’s call for “equality” doesn’t help women, and neither did the vulgar language and crude costumes. Defiance of what? Solidarity in what? In believing you’re cool because you banned pro-life groups from the march?
Since this march was a spectacular failure, the progressive females have decided to promote another march for a “Day Without Women” or some such thing. The chief promoter is a convicted terrorist. But her militant and bloody background should make her perfect for the militant phase of protests.