Archive for November 2008
Barack and Michelle Obama have released a statement expressing their condolences for those killed and injured in the tragedy at Mumbai, India. It is not a tragedy — it is a terrorist attack. Obama has always called 9/11 “a tragedy,” too. In fact, a reliable indicator of liberalism is a person’s refusal to call a terrorist operation what it is.
Most indigenous cultures, including those of many American Indians, believe that if you reveal your true name to someone, that person acquires some power over you. So how will Barack Obama fight terrorism when he refuses to name either the act or the actors?
He won’t. Terrorism is a criminal matter, suitable for lawyers and courtrooms, not soldiers and bullets, which is why he uttered not a peep when Rep. Barney Frank proposed cutting the military’s budget by 25%. We will hear lots of high-flown rhetoric about diplomacy and regaining the world’s respect, and talking to those disagree with us.
But remember Mumbai, because if Obama carries out his promise to close Gitmo immediately, the streets of those cities where the former Gitmo detainees are jailed will look more like India than America.
Terrorists attacked today in Mumbai, which is India’s financial center, targeting upscale Western tourist hotels and apparently searching for holders of US and British passports. I await Obama’s response, but I’m afraid it will be Clintonian, in that it will be all words and no action.
Obama’s choice of Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano as secretary of Homeland Security signals a focus on southern border immigration issues rather than on fighting terrorism. She has zero experience in battling terrorists, and she had just about ruined Arizona’s economy before the crunch hit.
I am not comforted that Obama will retain Robert Gates on as Secretary of Defense for a year. as that is much more about Obama being able to blame everything on George Bush than it is about actually listening to the SecDef.
Janet Porter asks three salient questions:
- If you were a natural born American citizen and had it within your means to quiet all the lawsuits and questions with proof, would you do it?
- If you were a natural born American citizen, would you spend thousands of dollars to fight the legal cases against you, or would you simply answer the legitimate question of whether you meet the constitutional requirements for office?
- If you were a natural born American citizen, would you forge a document called a “Certification of Live Birth” and tell the public it was a real “birth certificate”?
Whatever your view, she raises an excellent point about how he got into Pakistan at a time an American passport holder would have been denied entry. Read the whole thing here:
Brian Kennedy, a member of the Independent Working Group on Missile Defense, has a timely warning on an EMP (electromagnetic pulse) attack:
It would make the current fiscal fit look like child’s play, and is exactly the sort of event which Obama and the Democrats would wring their collective hands over and do nothing about.
For those of you stuck on the power grid, at least get yourself a manual NOT battery-operated!) can opener. I’m always astonished to hear of people who live in earthquake, hurricane and tornado zones and don’t have one . Mine cuts the side of the can, instead of cutting inside of the top, which means you can put the lid back on – handy when you’re competing with assorted varmints for the contents.
This is too funny:
NBC axed the entire staff of the The Weather Channel’s “Forecast Earth” environmental program during the middle of NBC’s “Green Week.”
But it’s still comitted to saving the earth, don’t you know.
Democrats are displaying, depending on your point of view, either total cluelessness or a deep sense of irony:
Yes, John Kerry will be chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the same committee he made an anti-Vietnam war appearance before over 30 years ago, giving testimony that gave him quite a reputation. I doubt we’ll see mentioned that none of the testimony of Kerry or the so-called Winter Soldiers could ever be corroborated because none of them would provide sufficient information for anyone to check it out.
We also won’t hear that Kerry’s testimony, claiming first-hand knowledge of some atrocities, means that he should have been subject to court-martial for failure to report the same. Nor should you hold your breath in anticipation of hearing about his trip to Paris, where he met with the Viet Cong, while still a member of the Naval Reserve. That little trip has long led to speculation that he had Jimmy Carter reissue his discharge papers because his originals contained something unsuitable for an ambitious young man running for public office. If that isn’t the case, one wonders why he never fulfilled his often made promise to release all his Navy papers during his presidential campaign.
It’s too early to tell if the Democrats will run completely amuck in Congress, but I take this as a sign.
Bret Stephens says liberals will shortly lose their excuses:
He’s correct, but I expect Obama will continue to blame Pres. Bush for everything, and liberals will continue to blame Republicans and conservatives for their own failures. They’ve learned such claims go over well, even when totally without substance, so they’ll continue employing them.
It’s safe to assume big media won’t call them on this tactic, so it’s up to us. Are you ready?